|
previous topic :: next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Kmun
Since 05 Jul 2009
283 Posts
Obsessed
|
Fri Sep 04, 26 2:20 pm 2.6 m "3.0 m" Wing, Armstrong XPS MKI |
|
|
2.6 m "3.0 m" Wing, Armstrong XPS MKI
Rigid handles
Great condition, no holes or repairs
About three or four sessions since it was purchased as new.
Note: When compared to other leading brands or the Armstrong XPS MKII, this model is one step more powerful than it's printed size. It has similar power to a 3.0m Duotone Unit or a 3.0m Armstrong MK II.
Note: The original bag is not included as it disappeared on its first use. I will instead included Cabrinha bag.
Just as the printing states on the Duotone Units, this 2.6m Armstrong wing handles more comfortably with a reduced pressure in the leading edge.
In most cases for the Gorge & La Ventana, I set the leading edge pressure to 15% of maximum pressures printed on all of my Armstrong & Slingshot wings.
 |
| |
2.6m top.jpeg |
 |
| |
2.6m bottom.jpeg |
|
|
|
IWantToFly
Since 29 Jul 2019
162 Posts
Stoked
|
Sat Sep 05, 26 11:52 pm |
|
|
| 15%??? So if the wing recommends 9 psi you pump to 1.35 psi? Do you perhaps mean 15% less than max or 85% of max pressure?
|
|
|
Kmun
Since 05 Jul 2009
283 Posts
Obsessed
|
Wed Sep 16, 26 10:20 am Reduce the leading edge pressure by 15% |
|
|
This 15% reduction is what I found most effective in having the wing behave better when it gets over powered in gusts. Most applicable on my 2.5 m -3.5m especially in cold, dense air, power punchy days. I use full pressure in larger sizes than 4.0m.
This reduction is most important in small body weight sailors that will not be able to load a wing back enough to effectively deform it enough & so that it will deliver power in a progressive manner.
Full pressure (max pressure) can be punchy all or nothing power delivery. A big guy holding a full pressure wing will have a different/more compliant wing behavior than a small person holding the same wing who in contrast will be getting thrown around by the wing.
|
|
|
|